1. National guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation (2012). Available at: http://scardio.ru/content/Guidelines/FP_rkj_13.pdf. Accessed by: 21.04.2014. Russian (Национальные рекомендации по диагностике и лечению фибрилляции предсердий (2012). Доступно на: http://scardio.ru/content/Guidelines/FP_rkj_13.pdf. Дата доступа: 21.04.2014).
2. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. The Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2010;31(19):2369-429.
3. AFFIRM Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1825-33.
4. Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA et al. A comparison ofrate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1834-40.
5. Carlsson J, Miketic S, Windeler J, STAF Investigators. Randomized trial of rate-control versus rhythmcontrol in persistent atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1690-96.
6. Opolski G, Torbicki A, Kosior DA. Rate control vs rhythm control in patients with nonvalvular persistent atrial fibrillation: the results of the Polish How to Treat Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (HOT CAFE) Study. Chest 2004;126:476-86.
7. Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S, et al. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2667-77.
8. Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Lilienthal J et al. Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation—Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trial. Lancet 2000;356:1789-94.
9. Chung MK, Shemansk IL, Sherman DG. et al. Functional status in rateversus rhythm-control strategies for atrial fibrillation: results of the atrial fibrillation follow-up investigation of rhythm management (AFFIRM) functional status substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1891-9.
10. Corley S. D., Epstein A. E., DiMarco J. P. et al. Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the atrial fibrillation follow-up investigation of rhythm management (AFFIRM) study. Circulation 2004; 109: 1509-13.
11. Ionescu-Ittu R., Abrahamowicz M., Jack evicius C. A. et al. Comparative effectiveness of rhythm control vs rate control drug treatment effect on mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172: 997-1004.
12. Nieuwlaat R., Capucci A., Camm A.J., et al. Atrial fibrillation management: a prospective survey in ESC member countries: the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 2422-34.
13. Goette A., Bukowska A., Dobrev D., et al. Acute atrial tachyarrhythmia induces angiotensin II type 1 receptor-mediated oxidative stress and microvascular flow abnormalities in the ventricles. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 1411-20.
14. Hsu L.F., Jais P., Sanders P., et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2373-83.
15. Khan M.N., Jais P., Cummings J., et al. Pulmonary-vein isolation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1778-85.
16. Rienstra M., Damman K., Mulder B.A. et al. Beta-blockers and outcomes in HF and AF. JACC 2013; (1):21-8.
17. Camm A. J., Savelieva I. Atrial fibrillation: the rate versus rhythm management controversy. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2012; 42 Suppl 18: 23-34.
18. Kanorsky SG. Modern drug therapy for atrial fibrillation: the choice of strategy, antiarrhythmic drugs and regimens. Attending Physician 2012; (7): 1-5. Russian (Канорский С.Г. Современная медикаментозная терапия фибрилляции предсердий: выбор стратегии, антиаритмических препаратов и схем лечения. Лечащий Врач 2012; (7): 1-5).