Статья

Сравнение прямого стентирования и стентирования с предилатацией у пациентов с острым инфарктом миокарда с подъемом сегмента ST

И. С. Бессонов, В. А. Кузнецов, И. П. Зырянов, С. С. Сапожников, Ю. В. Потолинская, Т. И. Зырянова
2017

Aim. To study was to assess in-hospital outcomes of direct coronary stenting (DS) compared with stenting after predilation (PD) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Material and methods. Data were collected from all patients (n=1103) with STEMI subjected to primary PCI in Tyumen cardiology center from 2006 to 2014. The clinical and angiographic characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, as well as predictors of no-reflow phenomenon were analyzed. The composite of in-hospital death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis were defined as major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Results. Altogether 563 patients (51%) underwent DS, and in 540 (49%) stents were implanted after PD. Patients in DS group compared with those in PD group were younger (57.9±10.9 vs 60±11.5 years; p=0.001), less often had chronic kidney disease (5.2 vs 8.4%; р=0.034), more often recieved prehospital thrombolysis (25 vs 11.9%; p

Бессонов И. С., Кузнецов В. А., Зырянов И. П., Сапожников С. С., Потолинская Ю. В., Зырянова Т. И. Сравнение прямого стентирования и стентирования с предилатацией у пациентов с острым инфарктом миокарда с подъемом сегмента ST. Кардиология. 2017;57(11):5-11. https://doi.org/10087/cardio.2017.11.10048
Цитирование

Список литературы

Похожие публикации