1. Salaun E., Pibarot P., Rodés-Cabau J. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Procedure and Outcomes. Cardiol Clin. 2020;38(1):115-128.doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2019.09.007
2. Ганюков В.И., Тарасов Р.С., Верещагин И.Е., Кочергин Н.А., Стасев А.Н., Нагирняк О.А., Барбараш Л.С. Транскатетерная имплантация аортального клапана и открытая хирургия аортального порока: сравнительная оценка результатов. Евразийский Кардиологический Журнал. 2018;(4):4-18. doi:10.38109/2225-1685-2018-4-4-18.
3. Malik A.H., Zaid S., Ahmad H., Goldberg J., Dutta T., Undemir C., Cohen M., Aronow W.S., Lansman S.L. A meta-analysis of 1-year outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC. 2020; 17(1): 43–50. doi:10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2020.01.005
4. Алекян Б.Г., Григорьян А.М., Стаферов А.В., Карапетян Н.Г. Рентгенэндоваскулярная диагностика и лечение заболеваний сердца и сосудов в Российской Федерации – 2021 год. Эндоваскулярная хирургия. 2022;9: 1–254. doi: 10.24183/2409-4080-2022-9S
5. Попова И.Н., Сергеева Т.Л. Импортозамещение в современной России: проблемы и перспективы. Beneficium. 2022; 2(43): 73–84. doi:10.34680/BENEFICIUM.2022.2(43).73-84
6. Prendergast P.J., Lally C., Lennon A.B. Finite element modelling of medical devices. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2009; 31(4): 419. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.03.002
7. Cicciù M. Bioengineering Methods of Analysis and Medical Devices: A Current Trends and State of the Art. Materials. 2020; 13(3): 797. doi:10.3390/ma13030797
8. Driscoll M. The Impact of the Finite Element Method on Medical Device Design. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering. 2019; 39(2): 171–172. doi:10.1007/s40846-018-0428-4
9. Marrey R., Baillargeon B., Dreher M.L., Weaver J.D., Nagaraja S., Rebelo N., Gong X.-Y. Validating Fatigue Safety Factor Calculation Methods for Cardiovascular Stents. Journal of biomechanical engineering. 2018; 140(6). doi:10.1115/1.4039173
10. Tzamtzis S., Viquerat J., Yap J., Mullen M.J., Burriesci G. Numerical analysis of the radial force produced by the Medtronic-CoreValve and Edwards-SAPIEN after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Medical Engineering and Physics. 2013; doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.04.009
11. Онищенко П.С., Глушкова Т.В., Костюнин А.Е., Резвова М.А., Барбараш Л.С. Физико-механические характеристики биоматериалов-лоскутов для задач численного моделирования. Журнал технической физики. 2022; 9(12): 1959–1966. doi:10.21883/JTF.2022.12.53763.174-22
12. Schultz C., Rodriguez-Olivares R., Bosmans J., Lefèvre T., De Santis G., Bruining N., Collas V., Dezutter T., Bosmans B., Rahhab Z., El Faquir N., Watanabe Y., Segers P., Verhegghe B., Chevalier B., Van Mieghem N., De Beule M., Mortier P., De Jaegere P. Patient-specific image-based computer simulation for the prediction of valve morphology and calcium displacement after TAVI with the Medtronic CoreValve and the Edwards SAPIEN valve. EuroIntervention. EuroIntervention; 2016; 11(9): 1044–1052. doi:10.4244/EIJV11I9A212
13. Rocatello G., El Faquir N., De Santis G., Iannaccone F., Bosmans J., De Backer O., Sondergaard L., Segers P., De Beule M., De Jaegere P., Mortier P. Patient-Specific Computer Simulation to Elucidate the Role of Contact Pressure in the Development of New Conduction Abnormalities After Catheter-Based Implantation of a Self-Expanding Aortic Valve. Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018; 11(2). doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005344
14. Gunning P.S., Vaughan T.J., McNamara L.M. Simulation of self expanding transcatheter aortic valve in a realistic aortic root: implications of deployment geometry on leaflet deformation. Annals of biomedical engineering. United States; 2014; 42(9): 1989–2001. doi:10.1007/s10439-014-1051-3
15. Russ C., Hopf R., Hirsch S., Sundermann S., Falk V., Szekely G., Gessat M. Simulation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation under consideration of leaflet calcification. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS. 2013; : 711–714. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609599
16. Bailey J., Curzen N., Bressloff N.W. Assessing the impact of including leaflets in the simulation of TAVI deployment into a patient-specific aortic root. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. England; 2016; 19(7): 733–744. doi:10.1080/10255842.2015.1058928
17. Nappi F., Mazzocchi L., Spadaccio C., Attias D., Timofeva I., Macron L., Iervolino A., Morganti S., Auricchio F. CoreValve vs. Sapien 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Finite Element Analysis Study. Bioengineering. 2021; 8(5): 52. doi:10.3390/bioengineering8050052
18. Bianchi M., Marom G., Ghosh R.P., Fernandez H.A., Taylor J.R.J., Slepian M.J., Bluestein D. Effect of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Positioning: A Patient-Specific Numerical Model. Artificial organs. 2016; 40(12): E292–E304. doi:10.1111/aor.12806
19. Tzamtzis S., Viquerat J., Yap J., Mullen M.J., Burriesci G. Numerical analysis of the radial force produced by the Medtronic-CoreValve and Edwards-SAPIEN after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Medical Engineering & Physics. 2013; 35(1): 125–130. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.04.009