Статья
Совершенствование возможностей оценки сердечно-сосудистого риска при помощи методов машинного обучения
Рост распространенности сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний (ССЗ) определяет важность их прогноза, необходимость точной стратификации рисков, профилактических и лечебных воздействий. Большие базы медицинских данных и технологии их обработки в виде алгоритмов машинного обучения, появившиеся в последние годы, потенциально позволяют улучшить предсказательную точность и персонализировать терапевтические подходы к ССЗ. В обзоре исследуется применение машинного обучения в предсказании и определении клинических событий кардиологического профиля. Обсуждается роль данной технологии как в расчете общего сердечно-сосудистого риска, так и предсказании отдельных заболеваний и событий. Сравнивается предсказательная точность с принятыми шкалами расчета рисков и действие различных алгоритмов машинного обучения. Анализируются условия для применения машинного обучения и возможности разработки персонализированной тактики ведения больных с ССЗ.
1. Шляхто Е.В., Баранова Е.И. Основные направления снижения сердечно-сосудистой смертности: что можно изменить уже сегодня? Российский кардиологический журнал. 2020;25(7):3983. doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3983.
2. Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale CP, et al. European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2019. European Heart Journal. 2020;41(1):12-85. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz859.
3. ВОЗ. Глобальный план действий по профилактике неинфекционных заболеваний и борьбе с ними на 2013-2020 годы. Доступно на: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/94384/9789244506233_rus.pdf.
4. ВОЗ. Доклад о ситуации в области неинфекционных заболеваний в мире, 2014. Доступно на: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/148114/WHO_NMH_NVI_15.1_rus.pdf.
5. Шляхто Е.В., Звартау Н.Э., Виллевальде С.В. и др. Система управления сердечно-сосудистыми рисками: предпосылки к созданию, принципы организации, таргетные группы. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2019;(11):69-82. doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2019-11-69-82.
6. Damen JA, Hooft L, Schuit E, et al. Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review. BMJ. 2016;353:i2416. doi:10.1136/bmj.i2416.
7. Rossello X, Dorresteijn J AN, Janssen A, et al. Risk prediction tools in cardiovascular disease prevention: A report from the ESC Prevention of CVD Programme led by the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) in collaboration with the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA) and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP). European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2019;26(14):1534-44. doi:10.1177/2047487319846715.
8. Benjamins JW, Hendriks T, Knuuti J, et al. A primer in artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine. Netherlands Heart Journal. 2019;27:392-402. doi:10.1007/s12471-019-1286-6.
9. Hemingway H, Asselbergs FW, Danesh J, et al. Innovative Medicines Initiative 2nd programme, Big Data for Better Outcomes, BigData@Heart Consortium of 20 academic and industry partners including ESC. Big data from electronic health records for early and late translational cardiovascular research: challenges and potential. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(16):1481-95. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx487.
10. Song X, Mitnitski A, Cox J, Rockwood K. Comparison of machine learning techniques with classical statistical models in predicting health outcomes. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):736-40. doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-949-3-736.
11. Wu J, Roy J, Stewart WF. Prediction modeling using EHR data: challenges, strategies, and a comparison of machine learning approaches. Medical Care. 2010;48(6 Suppl):S106-13. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181de9e17.
12. Weiss JC, Natarajan S, Peissig PL, et al. Machine Lea rning for Personalized Medicine: Predicting Primary Myocardial Infarction from Electronic Health Records. AI Magazin. 2012;33(4):33-45. doi:10.1609/aimag.v33i4.2438.
13. VanHouten JP, Starmer JM, Lorenzi NM, et al. Machine learning for risk prediction of acute coronary syndrome. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014:1940-9. eCollection 2014.
14. Dai W, Brisimi TS, Adams WG, et al. Prediction of hospitalization due to heart diseases by supervised learning methods. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84(3):189-97. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.10.002.
15. Tay D, Poh CL, Kitney RI. A novel neural-inspired learning algorithm with application to clinical risk prediction. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2015;54:305-14. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.12.014.
16. Loghmanpour NA, Kanwar MK, Druzdzel MJ, et al. A new Bayesian network-based risk stratification model for prediction of short-term and long-term LVAD mortality. ASAIO J. 2015;61(3):313-23. doi:10.1097/MAT.0000000000000209.
17. Churpek MM, Yuen TC, Winslow C, et al. Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(2):368-74. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001571.
18. Narain R, Saxena S, Goyal AK. Cardiovascular risk prediction: a comparative study of Framingham and quantum neural network based approach. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2016;10:1259-70. doi:10.2147/PPA.S108203.
19. Motwani M, Dey D, Berman DS, et al. Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(7):500-7. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw188.
20. Jae Kwon Kim, Sanggil Kang. Neural Network-Based Coronary Heart Disease Risk Prediction Using Feature Correlation Analysis. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2017:2780501. doi:10.1155/2017/2780501.
21. Shouval R, Hadanny A, Shlomo N, et al. Machine learning for prediction of 30-day mortality after ST elevation myocardial infraction: An Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey data mining study. Int J Cardiol. 2017;246:7-13. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.067.
22. Nanayakkara S, Fogarty S, Tremeer M, et al. Characterising risk of in-hospital mortality following cardiac arrest using machine learning: A retrospective international registry study. PLoS Med. 2018;15(11):e1002709. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002709.
23. Kakadiaris IA, Vrigkas M, Yen AA, et al. Machine Learning Outperforms ACC/AHA CVD Risk Calculator in MESA. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2018;7:e009476. doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.009476.
24. Dimopoulos A, Nikolaidou M, Caballero FF, et al. Machine learning methodologies versus cardiovascular risk scores, in predicting disease risk. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018;18:179. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0644-1.
25. Quesada JA, Lopez‐Pineda A, Gil‐Guillén VF, et al. Machine learning to predict cardiovascular risk. The International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2019;73(10):e13389. doi:10.1111/ijcp.13389.
26. Ambale-Venkatesh B, Yang X, Wu CO, et al. Cardiovascular Event Prediction by Machine Learning: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2017;121(9):1092-101. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311312.
27. Ren Y, Fei H, Liang X, et al. A hybrid neural network model for predicting kidney disease in hypertension patients based on electronic health records. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19:51. doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0765-4.
28. Samad MD, Ulloa A, Wehner GJ, et al. Predicting Survival From Large Echocardiography and Electronic Health Record Datasets: Optimization With Machine Learning. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(4):681-9. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.026.
29. Zack CJ, Senecal C, Kinar Y, et al. Leveraging Machine Learning Techniques to Forecast Patient Prognosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(14):1304-11. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.035.
30. Dinh A, Miertschin S, Young A, et al. A data-driven approach to predicting diabetes and cardiovascular disease with machine learning. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):211. doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0918-5.
31. Steele AJ, Denaxas SC, Shah AD, et al. Machine learning models in electronic health records can outperform conventional survival models for predicting patient mortality in coronary artery disease. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0202344. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202344.
32. Pieszko K, Hiczkiewicz J, Budzianowski P, et al. Machine-learned models using hematological inflammation markers in the prediction of short-term acute coronary syndrome outcomes. J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):334. doi:10.1186/s12967-018-1702-5.
33. Angraal S, Mortazavi BJ, Gupta A, et al. Machine Learning Prediction of Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. JACC: Heart Failure. 2020;8(1):12-21. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2019.06.013.
34. Weng SF, Reps J, Kai J, et al. Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data? Plos One. 2017;12(4):e0174944. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174944.
35. Ye C, Fu T, Hao S, et al. Prediction of Incident Hypertension Within the Next Year: Prospective Study Using Statewide Electronic Health Records and Machine Learning. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(1):e22. doi:10.2196/jmir.9268.
36. Mallya S, Srivastava N, Arai TJ, et al. Effectiveness of LSTMS in predicting congestive heart failure onset. 2019. Available from: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1902/1902.02443.pdf.
37. Wallert J, Tomasoni M, Madison G, et al. Predicting two-year survival versus non-survival after first myocardial infarction using machine learning and Swedish national register data. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2017;17(1):99. doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0500-y.
38. Golas SB, Shibahara T, Agboola S, et al. A machine learning model to predict the risk of 30-day readmissions in patients with heart failure: a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records data. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2018;18(1):44. doi:10.1186/s12911-018-0620-z.
39. Xia E, Du X, Mei J, et al. Outcome-Driven Clustering of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Using Multi-Task Neural Network with Attention. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;264:457-61. doi:10.3233/SHTI190263.
40. Sakr S, Elshawi R, Ahmed A, et al. (2018). Using machine learning on cardiorespiratory fitness data for predicting hypertension: The Henry Ford Exercise Testing (FIT) Project. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(4):e0195344. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195344.
41. Daghistani TA, Elshawi R, Sakr S, et al. Predictors of in-hospital length of stay among cardiac patients: A machine learning approach. Int J Cardiol. 2019;288:140-7. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.046.
42. Kendale S, Kulkarni P, Rosenberg AD, Wang J. Supervised Machine-learning Predictive Analytics for Prediction of Postinduction Hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(4):675-88. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000002374.
43. Meyer A, Zverinski D, Pfahringer B, et al. Machine learning for real-time prediction of complications in critical care: a retrospective study. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(12):905- 14. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30300-X.
44. Xu F, Zhu J, Sun N, et al. Development and validation of prediction models for hypertension risks in rural Chinese populations. J Glob Health. 2019;9(2):020601. doi:10.7189/jogh.09.020601.
45. Chen Y, Qi B. Representation learning in intraoperative vital signs for heart failure risk prediction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):260. doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0978-6.
46. Barrett LA, Payrovnaziri SN, Bian J, He Z. Building Computational Models to Predict One-Year Mortality in ICU Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Post Myocardial Infarction Syndrome. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.05072.pdf.
47. Payrovnaziri SN, Barrett LA, Bis D, et al. Enhancing Prediction Models for One-Year Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Post Myocardial Infarction Syndrome. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;264:273-7. doi:10.3233/SHTI190226.
48. Cheon S, Kim J, Lim J. The Use of Deep Learning to Predict Stroke Patient Mortality. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(11):e1876. doi:10.3390/ijerph16111876.
49. Alaa AM, Bolton T, Di Angelantonio E, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk prediction using automated machine learning: A prospective study of 423,604 UK Biobank participants. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0213653. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213653.
50. Padmanabhan M, Yuan P, Chada G, Nguyen HV. Physician-Friendly Machine Learning: A Case Study with Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):e1050, doi:10.3390/jcm8071050.
51. Choi E, Bahadori MT, Kulas JA, et al. RETAIN: an interpretable predictive model for healthcare using reverse time attention mechanism. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2016;3504-12. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.05745.pdf.
52. Choi E, Schuetz A, Stewart WF, Sun J. Using recurrent neural network models for early detection of heart failure onset. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(2):361-70. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw112.
53. Rasmy L, Wu Y, Wang N, et al. A study of generalizability of recurrent neural networkbased predictive models for heart failure onset risk using a large and heterogeneous EHR data set. J Biomed Inform. 2018;84:11-6. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.06.011.
54. Park J, Kim JW, Ryu B, et al. Patient-Level Prediction of Cardio-Cerebrovascular Events in Hypertension Using Nationwide Claims Data. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):e11757. doi:10.2196/11757.
55. Mezzatesta S, Torino C, Meo P, et al. A machine learning-based approach for predicting the outbreak of cardiovascular diseases in patients on dialysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019;177:9-15. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.005.
56. Mansoor H, Elgendy IY, Segal R, et al. Risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality in women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A machine learning approach. Heart Lung. 2017;46(6):405-11. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.09.003.
57. Sung JM, Cho IJ, Sung D, et al. Development and verification of prediction models for preventing cardiovascular diseases. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0222809. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222809.
58. Segar MW, Vaduganathan M, Patel KV, et al. Machine Learning to Predict the Risk of Incident Heart Failure Hospitalization Among Patients With Diabetes: The WATCH-DM Risk Score. Diabetes Care 2019;42(12):2298-306. doi:10.2337/dc19-0587