Статья
Компьютерная томографическая ангиография (КТ-ангиография, КТА) позволяет неинвазивно визуализировать коронарные артерии (КА). Данный метод обладает высокой чувствительностью в отношении диагностики коронарного атеросклероза. Однако стандартная КТА не позволяет оценить гемодинамическую значимость выявленных стенозов КА. Для этого требуются дополнительные функциональные тесты, направленные на выявление ишемии миокарда. Данный обзор освещает возможности клинического применения, ограничения, технические аспекты и перспективы комбинации КТ-ангиографии и перфузионной компьютерной томографии миокарда в диагностике ишемической болезни сердца.
1. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using 64-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2005;46(3):552–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.056
2. Vanhoenacker PK, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Van Heste R, Decramer I, Van Hoe LR, Wijns W et al. Diagnostic Performance of Multidetector CT Angiography for Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: Meta-analysis. Radiology. 2007;244(2):419–28. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2442061218
3. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I et al. Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Angiography by 64- Row CT. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;359(22):2324–36. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576
4. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E et al. Diagnostic Performance of 64-Multidetector Row Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Individuals Without Known Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;52(21):1724–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031
5. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1974;33(1):87–94. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(74)90743-7
6. Adjedj J, Toth GG, De Bruyne B. Invasive Measures of Myocardial Perfusion and Ischemia. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 2015;57(6):555–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.03.002
7. Salerno M, Beller GA. Noninvasive Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2009;2(5):412–24. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.854893
8. Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A, Kasprzak J, Lancellotti P, Poldermans D et al. Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). European Journal of Echocardiography. 2008;9(4):415–37. DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen175
9. Botvinick EH. Current Methods of Pharmacologic Stress Testing and the Potential Advantages of New Agents. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology. 2009;37(1):14–25. DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.108.057802
10. Seitun S, Castiglione Morelli M, Budaj I, Boccalini S, Galletto Pregliasco A, Valbusa A et al. Stress Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A New Topic in Cardiology. Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition). 2016;69(2):188–200. DOI: 10.1016/j. rec.2015.10.018
11. De Cecco CN, Varga-Szemes A, Meinel FG, Renker M, Schoepf UJ. Beyond Stenosis Detection: computed tomography approaches for determining the functional relevance of coronary artery disease. Radiologic Clinics of North America. 2015;53(2):317–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2014.11.009
12. Seitun S, De Lorenzi C, Cademartiri F, Buscaglia A, Travaglio N, Balbi M et al. CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A New Frontier in Cardiac Imaging. BioMed Research International. 2018;2018:7295460. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7295460
13. Соболева Г.Н., Гаман С.А., Терновой С.К., Шария М.А., Карпова И.Е., Карпов Ю.А. Нарушение перфузии миокарда левого желудочка при неизмененных коронарных артериях по данным объемной компьютерной томографии, совмещенной с фармакологической пробой аденозинтрифосфатом. Российский Электронный Журнал Лучевой Диагностики. 2018;8(3):273-8
14. Карпова И.Е., Самойленко Л.Е., Соболева Г.Н., Сергиенко В.Б., Карпов Ю.А. Применение однофотонной эмиссионной компьютерной томографии с 99mТс-МИБИ в сочетании с фармакологической пробой с аденозинтрифосфатом натрия в диагностике ишемии миокарда у больных ишемической болезнью сердца. Кардиология. 2013;53(2):91-6. PMID: 23548397
15. Cademartiri F, Seitun S, Clemente A, La Grutta L, Toia P, Runza G et al. Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by computed tomography. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. 2017;7(2):129–50. DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.22
16. Techasith T, Cury RC. Stress Myocardial CT Perfusion: an update and future perspective. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2011;4(8):905– 16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.04.017
17. Wong DTL, Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leong DP, Leung MCH, Malaiapan Y et al. Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Assessment Using Adenosine Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion + Computed Tomography Angiography With Transluminal Attenuation Gradient + Computed Tomography Angiography Against Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;63(18):1904–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.557
18. Rumberger JA, Feiring AJ, Lipton MJ, Higgins CB, Ell SR, Marcus ML. Use of ultrafast computed tomography to quantitate regional myocardial perfusion: A preliminary report. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1987;9(1):59–69. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(87)80083-9
19. Bell MR, Lerman LO, Rumberger JA. Validation of minimally invasive measurement of myocardial perfusion using electron beam computed tomography and application in human volunteers. Heart. 1999;81(6):628–35. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.81.6.628
20. Rumberger JA, Bell MR. Measurement of Myocardial Perfusion and Cardiac Output Using Intravenous Injection Methods by Ultrafast (Cine) Computed Tomography. Investigative Radiology. 1992;27(Suppl 2):S40–6. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199212002-00008
21. Rossi A, Merkus D, Klotz E, Mollet N, de Feyter PJ, Krestin GP. Stress Myocardial Perfusion: Imaging with Multidetector CT. Radiology. 2014;270(1):25–46. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13112739
22. Живоглядов Д.И., Шария М.А. Лучевые методы оценки перфузии миокарда. Российский Электронный Журнал Лучевой Диагностики. 2014;4(4):59-66
23. Веселова Т.Н., Терновой С.К. Информативность мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии в определении дефекта перфузии миокарда у больных острым инфарктом миокарда. Терапевтический архив. 2013;85(4):16-21
24. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, Leung M, Antonis PR, Nasis A et al. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. European Heart Journal. 2012;33(1):67–77. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr268
25. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Kitagawa K, Chang H-J, Bluemke DA et al. Adenosine Stress 64- and 256-Row Detector Computed Tomography Angiography and Perfusion Imaging: A Pilot Study Evaluating the Transmural Extent of Perfusion Abnormalities to Predict Atherosclerosis Causing Myocardial Ischemia. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2009;2(3):174–82. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.813766
26. Caruso D, Eid M, Schoepf UJ, Jin KN, Varga-Szemes A, Tesche C et al. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging. European Journal of Radiology. 2016;85(10):1893–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.07.017
27. Danad I, Szymonifka J, Schulman-Marcus J, Min JK. Static and dynamic assessment of myocardial perfusion by computed tomography. European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging. 2016;17(8):836– 44. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jew044
28. Hubbard L, Ziemer B, Lipinski J, Sadeghi B, Javan H, Groves EM et al. Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease Using WholeHeart Dynamic Computed Tomographic Perfusion. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2016;9(12):e005325. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005325
29. Duncker DJ, Koller A, Merkus D, Canty JM. Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow in Health and Ischemic Heart Disease. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 2015;57(5):409–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.12.002
30. Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y, Haraikawa T, Suzuki J, Shigematsu Y et al. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Adenosine Triphosphate Stress Multi-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography. Circulation Journal. 2005;69(5):550–7. DOI: 10.1253/circj.69.550
31. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MAS, DiPaula A, Thompson DR, McCarthy WF et al. Multidetector Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging During Adenosine Stress. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006;48(1):153–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.014
32. George RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, Kitagawa K, Bluemke DA, Lima JAC et al. Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion Using Dynamic 64-Detector Computed Tomography. Investigative Radiology. 2007;42(12):815–22. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318124a884
33. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, Rocha-Filho JA, Okada DR, Sarwar A et al. Adenosine-Induced Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Dual-Source Cardiac Computed Tomography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009;54(12):1072–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.014
34. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Bezerra HG, Okada DR, Rogers IS et al. Incremental Value of Adenosine-induced Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Dual-Source CT at Cardiac CT Angiography. Radiology. 2010;254(2):410–9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09091014
35. Cury RC, Magalhães TA, Paladino AT, Shiozaki AA, Perini M, Senra T et al. Dipyridamole stress and rest transmural myocardial perfusion ratio evaluation by 64 detector-row computed tomography. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2011;5(6):443–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.012
36. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M, Meredith IT, Leong DP, Antonis PR et al. Combined CT Coronary Angiography and Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Hemodynamically Significant Stenoses in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2012;5(11):1097–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.004
37. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Vavere AL, Bengel FM, Lardo AC et al. Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With 320-Row Detector Computed Tomography Accurately Detects Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2012;5(3):333–40. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.969303
38. Nasis A, Ko BS, Leung MC, Antonis PR, Nandurkar D, Wong DT et al. Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study. European Radiology. 2013;23(7):1812–21. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2788-z
39. Magalhães TA, Kishi S, George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Vavere AL, Cox C et al. Combined coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion by computed tomography in the identification of flow-limiting stenosis – The CORE320 study: An integrated analysis of CT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2015;9(5):438–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.03.004
40. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Cerci RJ, Vavere AL, Kitagawa K, Dewey M et al. Diagnostic Performance of Combined Noninvasive Coronary Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using 320-MDCT: The CT Angiography and Perfusion Methods of the CORE320 Multicenter Multinational Diagnostic Study. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2011;197(4):829–37. DOI: 10.2214/ AJR.10.5689
41. Cury RC, Kitt TM, Feaheny K, Blankstein R, Ghoshhajra BB, Budoff MJ et al. A randomized, multicenter, multivendor study of myocardial perfusion imaging with regadenoson CT perfusion vs single photon emission CT. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2015;9(2):103-112.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.01.002
42. Sørgaard MH, Kofoed KF, Linde JJ, George RT, Rochitte CE, Feuchtner G et al. Diagnostic accuracy of static CT perfusion for the detection of myocardial ischemia. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2016;10(6):450–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.09.003
43. Takx RAP, Blomberg BA, Aidi HE, Habets J, de Jong PA, Nagel E et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve Meta-Analysis. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015;8(1):e002666. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002666
44. Pontone G, Baggiano A, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Muscogiuri G et al. Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2019;12(8):1487–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.08.023
45. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, Lee YS, Bastarrika G, Chiaramida SA et al. Comparison of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography of the Heart With Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis and of the Myocardial Blood Supply. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2009;104(3):318–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.051
46. Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG, Shin JK, Chee HK, Chung HW et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dualenergy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. European Radiology. 2011;21(1):26–35. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1897-1
47. Ko SM, Choi JW, Hwang HK, Song MG, Shin JK, Chee HK. Diagnostic Performance of Combined Noninvasive Anatomic and Functional Assessment With Dual-Source CT and Adenosine-Induced Stress Dual-Energy CT for Detection of Significant Coronary Stenosis. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2012;198(3):512–20. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7029
48. De Cecco CN, Harris BS, Schoepf UJ, Silverman JR, McWhite CB, Krazinski AW et al. Incremental Value of Pharmacological Stress Cardiac Dual-Energy CT Over Coronary CT Angiography Alone for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in a High-Risk Population. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2014;203(1):W70–7. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11772
49. Kim SM, Chang S-A, Shin W, Choe YH. Dual-Energy CT Perfusion During Pharmacologic Stress for the Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Defects Using a Second-Generation Dual-Source CT: A Comparison With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 2014;38(1):44–52. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182a77626
50. Ko SM, Park JH, Hwang HK, Song MG. Direct comparison of stress- and rest-dual-energy computed tomography for detection of myocardial perfusion defect. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2014;30(S1):41–53. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0410-3
51. Ko SM, Song IY, Hwang HK, Shin JK. Stress Dual-Energy Computed Tomography-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Identify Coronary Artery Stenoses Causing Ischemia: A Direct Comparison between Invasive Coronary Angiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. Cardiovascular Imaging Asia. 2017;1(2):99–109. DOI: 10.22468/cvia.2016.00052
52. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H, Schmidt B, Allmendinger T, Haberland U et al. Quantitative Whole Heart Stress Perfusion CT Imaging as Noninvasive Assessment of Hemodynamics in Coronary Artery Stenosis: Preliminary Animal Experience. Investigative Radiology. 2010;45(6):298–305. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa3cf
53. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, Kang DK, Rowe GW, Schoepf UJ. Adenosine-Stress Dynamic Myocardial CT Perfusion Imaging: Initial Clinical Experience. Investigative Radiology. 2010;45(6):306–13. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa2f2
54. Ho K-T, Chua K-C, Klotz E, Panknin C. Stress and Rest Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Evaluation of Complete Time-Attenuation Curves With Dual-Source CT. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2010;3(8):811–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.05.009
55. Meinel FG, Ebersberger U, Schoepf UJ, Lo GG, Choe YH, Wang Y et al. Global Quantification of Left Ventricular Myocardial Perfusion at Dynamic CT: Feasibility in a Multicenter Patient Population. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2014;203(2):W174–80. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12328
56. Wichmann JL, Meinel FG, Schoepf UJ, Varga-Szemes A, Muscogiuri G, Cannaò PM et al. Semiautomated Global Quantification of Left Ventricular Myocardial Perfusion at Stress Dynamic CT: diagnostic accuracy for detection of territorial myocardial perfusion deficits compared to visual assessment. Academic Radiology. 2016;23(4):429–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.12.005
57. Lubbers M, Coenen A, Kofflard M, Bruning T, Kietselaer B, Galema T et al. Comprehensive Cardiac CT With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Functional Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2018;11(11):1625–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.010
58. Li Y, Yu M, Dai X, Lu Z, Shen C, Wang Y et al. Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Stenosis: CT Myocardial Perfusion versus Machine Learning CT Fractional Flow Reserve. Radiology. 2019;293(2):305–14. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190098