Статья
Выполнение, интерпретация результатов и применение стресс-эхокардиографии при ишемической болезни сердца. Методические рекомендации 2026
Российское кардиологическое общество (РКО)
1. Barbarash OL, Karpov YuA, Panov AV, et al. 2024 Clinical practice guidelines for Stable coronary artery disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(9):6110. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6110. EDN: HHJJUT.
2. 2020 Clinical practice guidelines for Stable coronary artery disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):4076. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4076. EDN: THCMQS.
3. Kotova EG, Kobjakova OS, Starodubov VI, et al. Morbidity of the entire population of Russia in 2022: statistical materials. M.: FGBU "CNIIOIZ" Minzdrava Rossii, 2023. 146 р. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-94116-072-3. EDN: BVSZOD.
4. Vaisman DSh, Enina EN. Сoronary artery disease mortality rates in the Russian Federation and a number of regions: dynamics and structure specifics. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2024;23(7):3975. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2024-3975. EDN: GRQJEM.
5. Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3415-537. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177.
6. Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, et al. 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2023;148(9): e9-e119. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001168.
7. Sonaglioni A, Polymeropoulos A, Baravelli M, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Exercise Stress Testing, Stress Echocardiography, Myocardial Scintigraphy, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of 104 Studies Published from 1990 to 2025. J Clin Med. 2025;14(17):6238. doi:10.3390/jcm14176238.
8. Knuuti J, Ballo H, Juarez-Orozco LE, et al. The performance of noninvasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability. European Heart Journal. 2018:393322-3330. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy267.
9. Wann LS, Faris JV, Childress RH, et al. Exercise cross-sectional echocardiography in ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1979;60:1300-8. doi:10.1161/01.cir.60.6.1300.
10. Botvin IM, Kostrova VV, Atkov OYu. Loading echocardiography. Methodological foundations. — Visualization in the clinic. 1997;(10):54-9. (In Russ.)
11. Saidova MA, Belenkov YuN, Atkov OYu, et al. Study of myocardial viability in patients with coronary heart disease with severe left ventricular dysfunction and chronic circulatory failure. Kardiologiia. 1998;(6):20-4. (In Russ.)
12. Pellikka P, Nagueh S, Elhendy A, et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am SocEchocardiogr. 2007;20:1021-41. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2007.07.003.
13. Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A, et al. European Association of Echocardiography. Stress Echocardiography Expert Consensus Statement–Executive Summary: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur Heart J. 2009;30:278-89. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn492.
14. Steeds RP, Wheeler R, Bhattacharyya S, et al. Stress echocardiography in coronary artery disease: a practical guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Res Pract. 2019;6(2): G17-G33. doi:10.1530/ERP-18-0068.
15. Pellikka PA, Arruda-Olson A, Chaudhry FA, et al. Guidelines for Performance, Interpretation, and Application of Stress Echocardiography in Ischemic Heart Disease: From the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(1):1-41.e8. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2019.07.001.
16. Hirano Y, Amano M, Obokata M, et al. Practice guidance for stress echocardiography. J Echocardiogr. 2024;22(1):1-15. doi:10.1007/s12574-024-00643-1.
17. Gallagher KP, Matsuzaki M, Osakada G, et al. Effect of exercise on the relationship between myocardial blood flow and systolic wall thickening in dogs with acute coronary stenosis. Circ Res. 1983;52(6):716-29. doi:10.1161/01.res.52.6.716.
18. Nørgaard BL, Terkelsen CJ, Mathiassen ON, et al. Coronary CT angiographic and flow reserve-guided management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2123-34. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.043.
19. Aquino GJ, Mastrodicasa D, Alabed S, et al. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging Highlights 2023. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024;6(2): e240020. doi:10.1148/ryct.240020.
20. Singh T, Bing R, Dweck MR, et al. Exercise electrocardiography and computed tomography coronary angiography for patients with suspected stable angina pectoris: a post hoc analysis of the randomized SCOT-HEART trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:920-8. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1567.
21. Christman MP, Bittencourt MS, Hulten E, et al. Yield of downstream tests after exercise treadmill testing: a prospective cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1264-74. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.052.
22. Rasmussen LD, Schmidt SE, Knuuti J, et al. Exercise electrocardiography for pre-test assessment of the likelihood of coronary artery disease. Heart. 2023;110:263-70. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2023-322970.
23. Beresten NF. Functional Diagnostics: National Guidelines. Edited by N. F. Beresten, V. A. Sandrikov, and S. I. Fedorova. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2019. 784 p. (Series "National Guidelines"). (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-9704-4242-5. EDN: NYMUEL.
24. Park TH, Tayan N, Takeda K, et al. Supine bicycle echocardiography improved dia-gnostic accuracy and physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease with the incorporation of intermediate stages of exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(19):1857-63. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.053.
25. Matskeplishvili ST, Saidova MA, Mironenko MYu, et al. Standard transthoracic echocardiography. Guidelines 2024. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(2):6271. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6271. EDN: TNLDFN.
26. Roger VL, Pellikka PA, Oh JK, et al. Stress echocardiography. Part I. Exercise echocardiography: techniques, implementation, clinical applications, and correlations. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70(1):5-15. doi:10.1016/S0025-6196(11)64659-4.
27. Badruddin SM, Ahmad A, Mickelson J, et al. Supine bicycle versus post-treadmill exercise echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia: a randomized single-blind crossover trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1999;33:1485-90. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00043-1.
28. Ling LH, Pellikka PA, Mahoney DW, et al. Atropine augmentation in dobutamine stress echocardiography: role and incremental value in a clinical practice setting. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1996;28:551-7. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(96)00195-7.
29. Afridi I, Kleiman NS, Raizner AE, Zoghbi WA. Dobutamine echocardiography in myocardial hibernation. Optimal dose and accuracy in predicting recovery of ventricular function after coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1995;91(3):663-70. doi:10.1161/01.cir.91.3.663.
30. Dal Porto R, Faletra F, Picano E, et al. Safety, feasibility, and diagnostic accuracy of accelerated high-dose dipyridamole stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(5):520-4. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01424-7.
31. Nelasov NYu, Sidorov RV, Morgunov MN, et al. Exercise test with adenosine triphosphate in stress echocardiography: justification of the optimal research algorithm. Kardiologiia. 2019;59(11):39-47. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/cardio.2019.11.266.
32. Feigenbaum H. Stress echocardiography: an overview. Herz. 1991;16(5):347-54.
33. Chapman PD, Doyle TP, Troup PJ, et al. Stress echocardiography with transesophageal atrial pacing: preliminary report of a new method for detection of ischemic wall motion abnormalities. Circulation. 1984;70(3):445-50. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.70.3.445.
34. Marangelli V, Iliceto S, Piccinni G, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease by digital stress echocardiography: Comparison of exercise, transesophageal atrial pacing and dipyridamole echocardiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1994;24(1):117-24. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(94)90551-7.
35. Schröder K, Völler H, Dingerkus H, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic potential of four echocardiographic stress tests shortly after acute myocardial infarction: submaximal exercise, transesophageal atrial pacing, dipyridamole, and dobutamine-atropine. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1996;77(11):909-14. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00027-6.
36. Picano E, Alaimo A, Chubuchny V, et al. Noninvasive pacemaker stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2002;40(7):1305-10. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02157-5.
37. Golikov AP, Ovchinnikov VP, Belozerov GE, Skorokhodov SI. Variants of the stress test with atrial stimulation in comparison with the angiographic picture of the coronary arteries. Kardiologiia. 1996;36(12):18-22. (In Russ.)
38. Picano E. Stress echocardiography. 6th ed. London: Springer International Publishing; 2015. 689 p. ISBN: 978-3-319-20957-9.
39. Saidova MA, Botvina YuV, Shitov VN, Atabaeva LS. Modified protocol of transesophageal atrial electrostimulation during stress echocardiography — an alternative way to increase the test’s informativeness for detecting latent coronary insufficiency. Kardiologiia. 2021;61(3):71-6. (In Russ.)
40. Krinochkin DV, Yaroslavskaya EI, Bessonov IS, et al. Diagnostic value of stress echocardiography with transesophageal electrostimulation using a shortened protocol in detecting myocardial ischemia. Kardiologiia. 2026;66(5):31-6. (In Russ.)
41. Weintraub WS, Hattori S, Agarwal JB, et al. The relationship between myocardial blood flow and contraction by myocardial layer in the canine left ventricle during ischemia. Circ Res. 1981;48(3):430-8. doi:10.1161/01.res.48.3.430.
42. Meizlish JL, Berger HJ, Plankey M, et al. Functional left ventricular aneurysm formation after acute anterior transmural myocardial infarction. Incidence, natural history, and prognostic implications. N Engl J Med. 1984;311(16):1001-6. doi:10.1056/NEJM198410183111601.
43. Picano E, Pierard L, Peteiro J, et al. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in chronic coronary syndromes and beyond coronary artery disease: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the ESC. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024;25(2): e65-e90. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jead250.
44. Gaibazzi N, Ciampi Q, Cortigiani L, et al.; Stress Echo 2030 Study Group. Multiple Phenotypes of Chronic Coronary Syndromes Identified by ABCDE Stress Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2024;37(5):477-85. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2023.12.003.
45. Boshchenko AA, Zhuravleva OA, Svyazova NN, et al. Stress echocardiography performed according to an extended protocol as a method for diagnosing hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses and phenotyping chronic coronary syndromes. Kardiologiia. 2026;66(1):3-16. (In Russ.)
46. Boschenko AA, Safarova AF, Zagatina AV, et al. 2026 Guidelines for Performing, interpretation, and appliance of stress echocardiography in coronary artery disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2026;31(6S):7105. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2026-7105. EDN: VAGVUG.
47. Gupta K, Kakar TS, Gupta A, et al. Role of left ventricle deformation analysis in stress echocardiography for significant coronary artery disease detection: A diagnostic study meta-analysis. Echocardiography. 2019;36(6):1084-94. doi:10.1111/echo.14365.
48. Stepanova AI, Radova NF, Alekhin MN. Speckle-tracking stress echocardiography using the treadmill test in assessing the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis. Kardiologiia. 2021;61(3):4-11. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/cardio.2021.3.n1462.
49. Upton R, Mumith A, Beqiri A, et al. Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Severe Coronary Artery Disease Using Artificial Intelligence. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15(5): 715-27. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.10.013.
50. O’Driscoll JM, Hawkes W, Beqiri A, et al. Left ventricular assessment with artificial intelligence increases the diagnostic accuracy of stress echocardiography. Eur Heart J Open. 2022;2(5): oeac059. doi:10.1093/ehjopen/oeac059.
51. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87-165. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.
52. Suzuki K, Hirano Y, Yamada H, et al. Practical guidance for the implementation of stress echocardiography. J Echocardiogr. 2018;16(3):105-29. doi:10.1007/s12574-018-0382-8.
53. Guerreiro RA, Fazendas P, Pereira AR, et al. Clinical and Echocardiographic Characterization of False-Positive Results from Stress Echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;28(2):123-33. doi:10.4250/jcvi.2019.0109.
54. Bloomgarden ZT. Approaches to cardiovascular disease and its treatment. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(12):3342-8. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.12.3342.
55. Poldermans D, Rambaldi R, Bax JJ, et al. Safety and utility of atropine addition during dobutamine stress echocardiography for the assessment of viable myocardium in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:1712-8. doi:10.1053/euhj.1998.1126.
56. Dolan MS, Gala SS, Dodla S, et al. Safety and efficacy of commercially available ultrasound contrast agents for rest and stress echocardiography a multicenter experience. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009;53:32-8. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.066.
57. Cheng VY, Berman DS, Rozanski A, et al. Performance of the traditional age, sex, and angina typicality-based approach for estimating pretest probability of angiographically significant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the multinational coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry (CONFIRM). Circulation. 2011;124(22):2423-32,1-8. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.039255.
58. Winther S, Schmidt SE, Mayrhofer T, et al. Incorporating coronary calcification into pre-test assessment of the likelihood of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2421-32. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.585.
59. Winther S, Schmidt SE, Rasmussen LD, et al. Validation of the European Society of Cardiology pre-test probability model for obstructive coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1401-11. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa755.
60. Winther S, Murphy T, Schmidt E, et al. Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline‐Recommended Pretest Probability Model for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e027260. doi:10.1161/JAHA.122.027260.
61. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:407-77. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
62. Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, et al. Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1291-300. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415516.
63. Douglas PS, Nanna MG, Kelsey MD, et al. Comparison of an initial risk-based testing strategy vs usual testing in stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the PRECISE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiology. 2023;8:904-14. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.2595.
64. Zhou J, Li C, Cong H, et al. Comparison of different investigation strategies to defer cardiac testing in patients with stable chest pain. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:91-104. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.08.022.
65. Winther S, Schmidt SE, Foldyna B, et al. Coronary calcium scoring improves risk prediction in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80:1965-77. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.805.
66. Porter TR, Mulvagh SL, Abdelmoneim SS, et al. Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Enhancing Agents in Echocardiography: 2018 American Society of Echocardiography Guidelines Update. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(3):241-74. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2017.11.013.
67. Lindner JR, Song J, Jayaweera AR, et al. Microvascular rheology of Definity microbubbles after intra-arterial and intravenous administration. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15(5):396-403. doi:10.1067/mje.2002.117290.
68. Senior R, Becher H, Monaghan M, et al.; EACVI Scientific Documents Committee for 2014-16 and 2016-18; EACVI Scientific Documents Committee for 2014-16 and 2016-18. Clinical practice of contrast echocardiography: recommendation by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) 2017. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(11):1205-1205af. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jex182.
69. Lindner JR. Phase-Conversion Nanoparticle Contrast Agents: Do Good Things Come in Small Packages? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(1):10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004374e004374. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004374.
70. Hayat SA, Dwivedi G, Jacobsen A, et al. Effects of left bundle-branch block on cardiac structure, function, perfusion, and perfusion reserve: implications for myocardial contrast echocardiography versus radionuclide perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2008;117(14):1832-41. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.726711.
71. Balcells E, Powers ER, Lepper W, et al. Detection of myocardial viability by contrast echocardiography in acute infarction predicts recovery of resting function and contractile reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(5):827-33. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02962-5.
72. Mattoso AA, Tsutsui JM, Kowatsch I, et al. Prognostic value of dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and normal left ventricular function. PLoS One. 2017;12(2): e0172280. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172280.
73. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation. 1998;97(5):473-83. doi:10.1161/01.cir.97.5.473.
74. Abdelmoneim SS, Dhoble A, Bernier M, et al. Quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography during pharmacological stress for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:813-25. doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jep084.
75. Jambrik Z, Monti S, Coppola V, et al. Usefulness of ultrasound lung comets as a nonradiologic sign of extravascular lung water. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1265-70. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.02.012.
76. Scali MC, Zagatina A, Ciampi Q, et al.; Stress Echo 2020 Study Group of the Italian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging. The Functional Meaning of B-Profile During Stress Lung Ultrasound. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(5):928-30. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.10.017.
77. Cortigiani L, Huqi A, Ciampi Q, et al. Integration of wall motion, coronary flow velocity, and left ventricular contractile reserve in a single test: prognostic value of vasodilator stress echocardiography in patients with diabetes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31:692-701. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2017.11.019.
78. Ciampi Q, Zagatina A, Cortigiani L, et al. Functional, Anatomical, and Prognostic Correlates of Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve During Stress Echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(18):2278-91. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1046.
79. Gurunathan S, Ahmed A, Vamvakidou A, et al. Diagnostic Concordance and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve and Stress Echocardiography for the Assessment of Coronary Stenosis of Intermediate Severity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(2):180-6. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2017.10.012.
80. Reynolds HR, Smilowitz NR. Ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries in the 2024 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2025;14(3):173-7. doi:10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf005.
81. Ciampi Q, Zagatina A, Cortigiani L, et al. Prognostic value of stress echocardiography assessed by the ABCDE protocol. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(37):3869-78. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab493.
82. Scali MC, Cortigiani L, Simionuc A, et al. Exercise-induced B-lines identify worse functional and prognostic stage in heart failure patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19(11):1468-78. doi:10.1002/ejhf.776.
83. Журавлева О. А., Рябова Т. Р., Врублевский А. В. и др. Прогностическое значение стресс-эхокардиографии, выполненной по расширенному протоколу, при стабильной ишемической болезни сердца. Кардиология. 2024;64(4):22-30. doi:10.18087/cardio.2024.4.n2572.
84. Kelshiker MA, Seligman H, Howard JP, et al. Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(16):1582-93. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab775. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2023;44(1):27. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac628.
85. Chaowalit N, McCully RB, Callahan MJ, et al. Outcomes after normal dobutamine stress echocardiography and predictors of adverse events: long-term follow-up of 3014 patients. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(24):3039-44. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl393.