Статья
СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ПРИНЦИПЫ ФИЗИОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ ЭЛЕКТРОКАРДИОСТИМУЛЯЦИИ
Рассматриваются современные представления о физиологической электрокардиостимуляции, анализируются результаты многоцентровых исследований, приводятся собственные данные по применению режимов, минимизирующих стимуляцию правого желудочка, бивентрикулярной стимуляции и стимуляции межжелудочковой перегородки.
1. Connolly S.J., Kerr C.R., Gent M., et al. Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing Investigators Effects of physiological pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1385-1391.
2. Lamas G.A., Lee K.L., Sweeney M.O., et al. MOST Investigators Ventricular pacing or dual chamber pacing for sinus node dysfunction N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1854-1862.
3. Toff W.D., Camm A.J., Skehan J.D., United Kingdom Pacing and Cardiovascular Events Trial (UKPACE) Investigators Single-chamber versus dual-chamber pacing for high-grade atrioventricular block N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 145-155.
4. Andersen H.R., Nielsen J.C., Rhomsen P.E.B., Mortensen P.T., Vesterlund T., Pedersen A.K. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome Lancet 1997; 350: 1210-1216.
5. Nielsen J.C., Kristensen L., Andersen H.R., Mortensen P.T., Pedersen O., Pedersen A.K. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndromeechocardiographic and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 614-623.
6. Sweeney M.O., Hellkamp A.S., Ellenbogen K.A., et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction Circulation 2003; 23: 2932-2937.
7. The DAVID Trial Investigators Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillatorthe Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 3115-3123.
8. Sharma A.D., Rizo-Patron C., Hallstrom A.P., et al. DAVID Investigators Percent right ventricular pacing predicts outcomes in the DAVID Trial Heart Rhythm 2005; 2: 830-834.
9. Steinberg J.S., Fischer A., Wang P., et al. The clinical implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial II J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005; 16: 359-365.
10. Vassalo J.A., Cassidy D.M., Miller J.M., Buxton A.E., Marchlinski F.E., Josephson M.E. Left ventricular endocardial activation during right ventricular pacingeffect of underlying heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7: 1228-1233.
11. Baldasseroni S., Opasich C., Gorini M., et al. Italian Network on Congestive Heart Failure Investigators Left bundle branch block is associated with increased 1-year sudden and total mortality rate in 5,517 outpatients with congestive heart failurea report from the Italian network on congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 2002; 143: 398-405.
12. Schneider J.F., Thomas Jr H.E., Kreger B.E., et al. Newly acquired left bundle branch blockthe Framingham study. Ann Intern Med 1979; 90: 303-310.
13. Prinzen F.W., Peschar M. Relation between the pacing induced sequence of activation and left ventricular pump function in animals Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002; 25: 484-498.
14. Lieberman R., Padeletti L., Schreuder J., et al. Ventricular pacing lead location alters systemic hemodynamics and left ventricular function in patients with and without reduced ejection fraction J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1634-1641.
15. Wiggers C. The muscular reactions of the mammalian ventricles to artificial surface stimuli Am J Physiol 1925; 73: 346-378.
16. Nahlawi M., Waligora M., Spies S.M., Bonow R.O., Kadish A.H., Goldberger J. Left ventricular function during and after right ventricular pacing J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1883-1888.
17. Tantengco M.V., Thomas R.L., Karpawich P.P. Left ventricular dysfunction after long-term tight ventricular apical pacing in the young J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 2093-2100.
18. Baller D., Wolpers H.-G., Zipfers J., Bretschneider H.-J. Comparison of the effects of right atrial, right ventricular apex, and atrioventricular sequential pacing on myocardial oxygen consumption and cardiac efficiencya laboratory investigation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988; 11: 394-403.
19. Prinzen F.W., Augustijn C.H., Arts T., Allessi M.A., Reneman R.S. Redistribution of myocardial fiber strain and blood flow by asynchronous activation Am J Physiol 1990; 259: H300-H308.
20. Prinzen F.W., Hunter W.C., Wyman B.T., et al. Mapping of regional myocardial strain and work during ventricular pacingexperimental study using magnetic resonance imaging tagging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1735-1742.
21. Lee M.A., Dae M.W., Langberg J.L., et al. Effects of longterm right ventricular pacing on left ventricular perfusion, innervation, function and histology J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 225-232.
22. Delhaas T., Arts T., Prinzen F.W., Reneman R.S. Regional fiber stress-fiber strain as estimate of regional oxygen demand in the canine heart J Physiol (Lond) 1994; 477: 481-496.
23. Tse H.-F., Lau C.P. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 744-749.
24. Nielsen J.C., Bottcher M., Nielsen T.T., Pedersen A.K., Andersen H.R. Regional myocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single chamber or dual chamber pacing—effect of pacing mode and rate J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1453-1461.
25. Zile M., Blaustein A., Shimizu G., et al. Right ventricular pacing reduces the rate of left ventricular relaxation and filling J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 702-709.
26. Prinzen F.W., Cheriex E.C., Delhaas T., et al. Asymmetric thickness of the left ventricular wall resulting from asynchronous electric activationa study in dogs with ventricular pacing and in patients with left bundle branch block. Am Heart J 1995; 130: 1045-1053.
27. Van Oosterhout M.F.M., Prinzen F.W., Arts T., et al. Asynchronous electrical activation induces asymmetrical hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall Circulation 1998; 98: 588-595.
28. Spragg D.D., Leclercq C., Loghmani M., et al. Regional alterations in protein expression in the dyssynchronous failing heart Circulation 2003; 108: 929-932.
29. Sweeney M.O., Prinzen F.W. A new paradigm for physiologic ventricular pacing J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 282-288.
30. Andersen H.R., Nielsen J.C., Thomsen P.E.B., et al. Atrioventricular conduction during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome Circulation 1998; 98: 1315-1321.
31. Nielsen J.C., Pedersen A.K., Mortensen P.T., Andersen H.R. Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome Europace 1999; 1: 113-120.
32. Sweeney M.O., Shea J.B., Fox V., et al. Randomized trial of a new atrial-based minimal ventricular pacing mode in dual chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorsMVP. Heart Rhythm 2004; 1: 160-167.
33. Savoure A., Frohlig G., Galley D., et al. A new dualchamber pacing mode to minimize ventricular pacing Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28(Suppl 1): S43-S46.
34. Gillis A.M., Pererfellner H., Israel C.W., et al. Reduction of unnecessary ventricular pacing due to the Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP) mode in pacemaker patients: benefit for both sinus node disease (SND) and AV block (AVB) indications. Heart Rhythm. 2005; Abstract AB21-1
35. Sweeney M.O., Ellenbogen K.A., Casavant D., et al. Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Safety and Efficacy Study of a new atrial-based managed ventricular pacing Mode (MVP) in dual chamber ICDs. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005; 16: 811-17.
36. Yee R., Klein G.J., Krahn A.C., Skanes A.C. Selective site pacing: tools and training. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004; 27: 894-6.
37. De Cock C.C., Giudici M.C., Twisk J. Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacinga quantitative review. Europace 2003; 5: 275-278.
38. Furman S., Schwedel J.B. An intracardiac pacemaker for Stokes-Adams Seizures. N Engl J Med 1959; 261: 943-8.
39. Tse H.F., Yu C., Wong K.K., et al. Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacingthe effect of sites of electrical stimulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1451-1458.
40. Victor F., Mabo P., Mansour H., et al. A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17: 238-42.
41. Laske T.G., Skadsberg N.D., Hill A.J., Klein G.J., Isizzo P.A. Excitation of the intrinsic conduction system through his and interventricular septal pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006; 29: 397- 405.
42. Occhetta E., Bortnik M., Magnani A., et al. Prevention of ventricular desynchronization by permanent para-Hisian pacing after atrioventricular node ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation: a crossover, blinded, randomized study versus apical right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 1938-45.
43. Deshmukh P., Casavant D.A., Romanyshyn M., Anderson K. Permanent, direct His-bundle pacing: a novel approach to cardiac pacing in patients with normal His-Purkinje activation. Circulation 2000; 101: 869-77.
44. Lu F., Iaizzo P.A., Benditt D.G., et al. Isolated Atrial Segment Pacing: An Alternative to His Bundle Pacing After Atrioventricular Junctional Ablation (J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 1443-9.
45. Leon A., Greenberg M., Kanuru N., et al. Cardiac resynchronization in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillationeffect of upgrading to biventricular pacing after chronic right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1258-1263.
46. Leclercq C., Walker S., Linde C., et al. Comparative effects of permanent biventricular and right-univentricular pacing in heart failure patients with chronic atrial fibrillation Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 1780-1787.
47. Peschar M., de Swart H., Michels K.J., Reneman R.S., Prinzen F.W. Left ventricular septal and apex pacing for optimal pump function in canine hearts J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1218-1226.
48. Vanagt W.Y., Verbeek X.A., Delhaas T., Mertens L., Daenen W.J., Prinzen F.W. The left ventricular apex is the optimal site for pediatric pacingcorrelation with animal experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004; 27: 837-843.